-
Geographic Variation: Travel ‘Round and Take Notes

You, esteemed reader, in your woods-wanderings have no doubt crossed paths with the equally estimable Marasmius plicatulus. If not, it is my pleasure to introduce the both of you. Charmed, I’m sure.
The tall, brightly-colored fruitbodies occur in many kinds of habitats every year, often in large troops. And what an excellent little mushroom to be so familiar! This species has a lot of features setting it apart from the rest of its marasmioid brethren: electric-sunset stipe coloration, oddly wiry stipes (often tipped in pom-poms of creamy-white mycelium), and finely velvety caps (often covered in beaded-up water droplets).
But how many of us have given much thought to the geographic range and morphological variation of this species? Don’t answer that. A quick search on www.mushroomobserver.org (hereafter referred to as ‘MO’) gives us the following map of observations for this species:

Some interesting points to take note of:
- As we try and familiarize ourselves with any species, it’s always a good idea to try and describe its range in one or two simple sentences. For this one, I’d summarize it as: Pacific states, primarily coastal, common. More detailed looks at the notes and photos included with these MO observations would show that it inhabits almost any kind of habitat: pine, cypress, oak, fir, spruce, really any place with trees and sufficient duff on the ground.
- The glaring gap in southern Oregon – this is almost certainly due to the lack of observers in the area, not an actual disjunction in the distribution of the species. Just goes to show how important citizen scientists are in our effort to document the distribution of macrofungi. Going on a beer tasting tour to Oregon’s Arch Rock Brewing Company? Take a photo of our Mushroom of the Month while you are in Curry County and help us fill in the Gap on the Map!
- The apparent southern limit around Los Angeles – does this species really not occur in San Diego County? A quick message to Bonni McKintosh of the San Diego Mycological Society confirmed my memory that it’s common there (especially under shrubs like Toyon and Laurel Sumac)! So why the gap? Once again, lack of participation on mushroomobserver.org. Public databases like this are absolutely dependent on their users for data!
- A closer look at the map would show a few observations away from the coast and a bit closer to the central valley, but none from the Sierra foothills or higher elevations.
Now that we’ve got a basic sense of the distribution of this species, let’s look at its morphological variation, specifically with regard to color. The sequence below shows two typical forms (from the mainland and Santa Cruz Island, of the Channel Islands), followed by two less-common forms.

The typical coastal form, with a red cap, and fairly dark stem showing a gradient of stipe color from black near the base to orange, pink, or white near the apex.

A bright but typical form found on Santa Cruz Island, with vivid magenta and pink colors on the stipe, and nearly cherry-red caps.

An orange-brown form (almost entirely lacking pink and red colors) from Santa Cruz Island, where it was nearly as common as the red form.

These are the most unusually-colored fruitbodies of this species I’ve ever encountered: completely pastel-pink, with hardly a trace of orange, and most importantly, none of the characteristic black or brown stipe pigmentation.
The orange-brown color form in the third photo is not restricted to Santa Cruz Island; in fact, fruitbodies showing these colors are more commonly found in the northern reaches of this species’ range on the mainland, (where the typical red form is also present). Most of the “Orange-brown Form” currently on Mushroom Observer are from Oregon: Sava Krstic’s 117825, Daniel Wheeler’s 14662, Britney Ramsey’s 80819, 61364, and 59467; although there are a few from northern California: Darvin DeShazer’s 122671 and Douglas Smith’s 17325; Noah Siegel has also found it in Jedediah Smith Redwoods State Park in Del Norte County.
* Note: to search for any of the observations listed above, go to mushroomobserver.org and type or paste the observation number into the search bar at the top of the page as shown below:

So what accounts for the color variation in this species? Climatic conditions don’t seem to explain the pattern, since three of the forms have been found growing right next to each other. Partially (or completely?) reproductively-isolated populations combined with random drift in pigment genes? Possibly, but it’ll take a lot of work to prove that hypothesis. Inherent variation between freely-interbreeding populations? Possibly, but why are the bulk of orange-brown forms found north of Mendocino County, and why is the pink form so rare? And even then, they co-occur with the “Red Form”; do any of fruitbodies in these areas show intermediate coloration? All these questions remain to be answered.
As I hope I’ve shown with this month’s article, we have much to learn about even the most common and familiar mushrooms. No area is too small, no question too basic! Get outside and document what you see. Take notes, take pictures, take specimens for your herbarium. With the help of citizen scientists like you, we’ll make more rapid progress to a Mycoflora of North America.
Don’t go to college. Buy a cheap camera and a bunch of Rite-in-the-Rain notebooks. Hitchhike and hop trains and document mushroom pigment variations.
#nu-punx #myco-bums -

Posted on April 13, 2013 via Control with 9 notes
-
Pro tip: If you see a larger mushroom overlapping a smaller one, you can take advantage of the “natural spore print” it often leaves. Beware, though, that the cap color and moisture of the lower cap can change the appearance of the spore deposit.
These are Candy Caps, showing the very pale (nearly white) spore print.
The very similar False Candy Cap (L. rufulus) have a pale but more beige-buff spore deposit. -

A helpful visual aid for the development of an Amanita fruitbody
(via mushroomporn)
Posted on February 22, 2013 via Je suis un Miraculé Social with 238 notes
Source: palettebenjamin
-
smythtopher asked: I've been following your blog for quite a while now. I really enjoy your stuff. Any career/academic advice for an up-and-coming Mycologist? I'm hopefully headed to Grad school in the Fall. Thanks!
Being a college dropout, I’m not qualified to answer this, but I do interact with academia pretty frequently, so here’s my advice: choose a grad school carefully! And cultivate your knowledge and explore your interests BEFORE you start grad school. Don’t just let a professor foist a project on you. Too many students have done so, becoming faux-experts in a year or two, publishing on the topic, and then disappearing from the field forevermore (while those of us who actually care are left to deal with the messes they left us). I’m probably being excessively negative here…
-
Much sought after. One of the most delicious wild mushrooms: Craterellus cornucopioides, fruiting under a live oak or tanoak near you. Now. Or maybe last week. Or maybe more later this month.
-
The really rather mind-bending architecture of the fertile surface of Craterellus cinereus, a congener of the Black Trumpet. Anastomoses. Look it up. But not on Image Search.
-
Subtle beauty prevails.
Yellows, browns, pinkish cream, textures, statures: a sampling of that glorious Santa Cruz winter/spring crossover mycoflora that I love.
I found a dead shrew today. -
The five Fungi Fish plan is complete! I have just ordered this as my new phone case, and will show you what it looks like when it arrives. :]
This is pretty neat.
(via whimandvinegar)
Posted on February 2, 2013 via D. [art] with 34 notes
Source: decoma
-
Superlatively fantastic work by Nick Lariontsev.
Perhaps even more impressive is his home-made setup.



![decoma:
The five Fungi Fish plan is complete! I have just ordered this as my new phone case, and will show you what it looks like when it arrives. :]
This is pretty neat.](http://24.media.tumblr.com/652b24a7de4db632d79fae564b0a683b/tumblr_mhfrsnaAaC1qaeejco1_500.jpg)